State v. Segura

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Segura

352 So. 2d 1030, 1977 La. LEXIS 6605

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 2, 1977

DocketNo. 60859

StatusPublished

This text of 352 So. 2d 1030 (State v. Segura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Segura, 352 So. 2d 1030, 1977 La. LEXIS 6605 (La. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant is charged in St. Charles Parish with public bribery. La.R.S. 14:118. The state’s answer to the bill of particulars shows that the offense was committed in Jefferson Parish. The trial court therefore erred in denying the motion to quash. State v. Bloomensteil, 235 La. 860, 106 So.2d 288 (1958). Consequently, we reverse its ruling and grant the motion to quash the indictment, unless the defect is cured within three days of the date of finality of this order. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 485.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant is charged in St. Charles Parish with public bribery. La.R.S. 14:118. The state’s answer to the bill of particulars shows that the offense was committed in Jefferson Parish. The trial court therefore erred in denying the motion to quash. State v. Bloomensteil, 235 La. 860, 106 So.2d 288 (1958). Consequently, we reverse its ruling and grant the motion to quash the indictment, unless the defect is cured within three days of the date of finality of this order. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 485.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

352 So. 2d 1030, 1977 La. LEXIS 6605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-segura-la-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack