State v. Sefton

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Sefton

426 P.3d 746, 191 Wash. 2d 1016

Washington Supreme Court·Decided October 3, 2018·No. No. 95997-8·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its October 2, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That both petitions for review are denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its October 2, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That both petitions for review are denied.

For the Court/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Sefton, 426 P.3d 746, 191 Wash. 2d 1016 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

426 P.3d 746 (State v. Sefton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.