State v. Sebecca
76 Mo. 55
Opinion
The defendant was proqpded against by affidavit charging him with practicing medicine without [56]*56having filed, his diploma or registered his name in the county clerk’s office as provided'by statute. No information based upon said affidavit was filed by the prosecuting attorney as required by law, (Acts 1877, p. 355, § 6,) and the proceeding was properly dismissed by the circuit court. The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sebecca, 76 Mo. 55 (Mo. 1882).
76 Mo. 55 (State v. Sebecca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Carr
44 S.W. 776 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)
State v. Kelm
79 Mo. 515 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)