Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Sebastian

State v. Sebastian

639 So. 2d 991, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 1994 WL 34071
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 1994
DocketNo. 93-896
StatusPublished

This text of 639 So. 2d 991 (State v. Sebastian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sebastian, 639 So. 2d 991, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 1994 WL 34071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

As the defendant properly concedes, the trial court erred in striking restitution as a condition of probation. See Gladfelter v. State, 618 So.2d 1364 (Fla.1993) (as long as “restitution was made an original condition of the probation, the court could properly determine the amount of restitution at a later [992]*992date.”); Fairweather v. State, 696 So.2d 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 589 So.2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“trial court may properly determine the amount of restitution at hearing subsequent to the sentencing date.”).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gladfelter v. State
618 So. 2d 1364 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Smith v. State
589 So. 2d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 So. 2d 991, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 759, 1994 WL 34071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sebastian-fladistctapp-1994.