State v. Seay
74 S.E. 652, 91 S.C. 342, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 232
Opinion
It appearing, upon the call of this case, that the only notice served by the appellant was upon an attorney who was not authorized to accept service for the respondent, and who only accepted on condition that he should be employed by the respondent; and it further appearing that the time for appealing has expired,
It is, therefore, ordered, that the appeal be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Seay, 74 S.E. 652, 91 S.C. 342, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 232 (S.C. 1912).
74 S.E. 652 (State v. Seay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.