State v. Seaton

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Seaton

67 P. 572, 27 Wash. 120, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 369

Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 2, 1902·No. No. 4159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application to stay the exe cution of the death sentence of William Aldon Seaton under the judgment of the superior court of King county. The application for the stay of execution is founded upon a notice of appeal filed in the superior court, from the order of the judge of that court fixing the day of execution, and directed to the sheriff of the county. Tbh prosecuting attorney of King county opposes the application, and moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order made is not appealable. The motion must be sustained upon the authority of State v. Nordstrom, 21 Wash. 403 (58 Pac. 248, 53 L. R. A. 584), and State v. Boyce, 25 Wash. 422 (65 Pac. 763). The application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an application to stay the exe cution of the death sentence of William Aldon Seaton under the judgment of the superior court of King county. The application for the stay of execution is founded upon a notice of appeal filed in the superior court, from the order of the judge of that court fixing the day of execution, and directed to the sheriff of the county. Tbh prosecuting attorney of King county opposes the application, and moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order made is not appealable. The motion must be sustained upon the authority of State v. Nordstrom, 21 Wash. 403 (58 Pac. 248, 53 L. R. A. 584), and State v. Boyce, 25 Wash. 422 (65 Pac. 763). The application is denied.

State v. Seaton, 67 P. 572, 27 Wash. 120, 1902 Wash. LEXIS 369 (Wash. 1902).

Pincite

67 P. 572 (State v. Seaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related