State v. Seaton

200 S.W.3d 113, 2006 WL 1675217

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2006·No. WD 65333·Published

Opinion

200 S.W.3d 113 (2006)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Brandon D. SEATON, Appellant.

No. WD 65333.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 20, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 1, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied September 26, 2006.

Ruth Sanders, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang and Lisa M. Kennedy, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City for Respondent.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, Judge, and PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 1, 2006.

ORDER

Brandon D. Seaton appeals the circuit court's judgment convicting him of statutory sodomy in the first degree. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

200 S.W.3d 113 (2006)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Brandon D. SEATON, Appellant.

No. WD 65333.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 20, 2006. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 1, 2006. Application for Transfer Denied September 26, 2006.

Ruth Sanders, Appellate Defender Office, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Shaun Mackelprang and Lisa M. Kennedy, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City for Respondent.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA A. BRECKENRIDGE, Judge, and PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied August 1, 2006.

ORDER

Brandon D. Seaton appeals the circuit court's judgment convicting him of statutory sodomy in the first degree. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Seaton, 200 S.W.3d 113, 2006 WL 1675217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

200 S.W.3d 113 (State v. Seaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.