State v. Sears, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Sears, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005)

DecidedApril 27, 2005

DocketNo. C-040565.

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Sears, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005) (State v. Sears, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sears, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005), (Ohio Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT ENTRY. This appeal is considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, and this Judgment Entry is not an Opinion of the Court under S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 3(A).

Defendant-appellant James Sears appeals his conviction for failing to provide notice of a change of address. Sears had been convicted of sexual battery and was therefore required to register his residence with the sheriff's office.¹ His sole assignment of error argues that we have declared reporting requirements for sexually oriented offenders unconstitutional.² But we overruled that decision in State v.Cooper.³ We therefore overrule Sears's sole assignment of error and affirm the trial court's judgment.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Painter, JJ.

¹ See R.C. 2950.05(E).

² See State v. Anthony, 1st Dist. No. C-030510, 2004-Ohio-3894.

³ 1st Dist. No. C-030921, 2004-Ohio-6428.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT ENTRY. This appeal is considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, and this Judgment Entry is not an Opinion of the Court under S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 3(A).

Defendant-appellant James Sears appeals his conviction for failing to provide notice of a change of address. Sears had been convicted of sexual battery and was therefore required to register his residence with the sheriff's office.¹ His sole assignment of error argues that we have declared reporting requirements for sexually oriented offenders unconstitutional.² But we overruled that decision in State v.Cooper.³ We therefore overrule Sears's sole assignment of error and affirm the trial court's judgment.

Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.

Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Painter, JJ.

¹ See R.C. 2950.05(E).

² See State v. Anthony, 1st Dist. No. C-030510, 2004-Ohio-3894.

³ 1st Dist. No. C-030921, 2004-Ohio-6428.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Sears, Unpublished Decision (4-27-2005), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sears-unpublished-decision-4-27-2005-ohioctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack