State v. Sears

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

State v. Sears

1931 OK CR 265, 299 P. 925, 51 Okla. Crim. 106, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided May 29, 1931·No. No. A-7974.·Published

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was by information charged with the unlawful, willful, wrongful, fraudulent, and felonious selling, exchanging, and delivering to one Noah Herron, a forged and counterfeited note, was acquitted, and the state appeals.

The record shows that the defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was acquitted by the verdict of a jury; therefore the questions raised by the state are moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was by information charged with the unlawful, willful, wrongful, fraudulent, and felonious selling, exchanging, and delivering to one Noah Herron, a forged and counterfeited note, was acquitted, and the state appeals.

The record shows that the defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was acquitted by the verdict of a jury; therefore the questions raised by the state are moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

State v. Sears, 1931 OK CR 265, 299 P. 925, 51 Okla. Crim. 106, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

1931 OK CR 265 (State v. Sears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.