State v. Sears

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

State v. Sears

1931 OK CR 265, 299 P. 925, 51 Okla. Crim. 106, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 29, 1931

DocketNo. A-7974.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 265 (State v. Sears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sears, 1931 OK CR 265, 299 P. 925, 51 Okla. Crim. 106, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was by information charged with the unlawful, willful, wrongful, fraudulent, and felonious selling, exchanging, and delivering to one Noah Herron, a forged and counterfeited note, was acquitted, and the state appeals.

The record shows that the defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was acquitted by the verdict of a jury; therefore the questions raised by the state are moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was by information charged with the unlawful, willful, wrongful, fraudulent, and felonious selling, exchanging, and delivering to one Noah Herron, a forged and counterfeited note, was acquitted, and the state appeals.

The record shows that the defendant in error, M. R. Sears, was acquitted by the verdict of a jury; therefore the questions raised by the state are moot.

The appeal is dismissed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 265, 299 P. 925, 51 Okla. Crim. 106, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sears-oklacrimapp-1931.