State v. Sears

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sears

386 S.W.3d 925, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1618, 2012 WL 6597736

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. WD 74130·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Chad A. Sears appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of possession of child pornography, section 573.037, and sentencing him to twelve years. Mr. Sears challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his jury conviction, the trial court’s failure to grant a mistrial, and the trial court’s failure to sustain his objections to the admission of evidence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Chad A. Sears appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of possession of child pornography, section 573.037, and sentencing him to twelve years. Mr. Sears challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his jury conviction, the trial court’s failure to grant a mistrial, and the trial court’s failure to sustain his objections to the admission of evidence.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Sears, 386 S.W.3d 925, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1618, 2012 WL 6597736 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 925 (State v. Sears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.