State v. Seal

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Seal

455 S.W.3d 523, 2015 WL 966031

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 3, 2015·No. WD 77069·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Robert Seal appeals from his conviction of one count of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, and one count of stealing a firearm, § 570.030. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for a. mistrial and by improperly sentencing him based upon his decision to exercise his right to trial. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal Written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Robert Seal appeals from his conviction of one count of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170, and one count of stealing a firearm, § 570.030. Appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying his request for a. mistrial and by improperly sentencing him based upon his decision to exercise his right to trial. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal Written opinion. However, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Seal, 455 S.W.3d 523, 2015 WL 966031 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

455 S.W.3d 523 (State v. Seal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.