State v. Scurlock

791 N.E.2d 982, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1466
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 16, 2003
Docket2003-1001
StatusPublished

This text of 791 N.E.2d 982 (State v. Scurlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Scurlock, 791 N.E.2d 982, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1466 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2002CA34, 2003-0hio-1052. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
791 N.E.2d 982, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scurlock-ohio-2003.