State v. . Scruggs
This text of 20 S.E. 720 (State v. . Scruggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No appeal lies in a criminal action until after the rendition of final judgment in the cause. State v. Twiggs, 90 N. C., 685. If the case were properly before us, as on an application for a certiorari, we should find no ground for granting the writ, for it has long been settled that, in a trial for a capital felony, for sufficient cause the Judge may discharge the jury and hold the prisoner for another trial. In which case it is his duty to find the facts and set them out in the record, so that his conclusion as to the matter of law arising from the facts may be reviewed by this Court. State v. Jefferson, 74 N. C., 309. All this his Honor did, and it will serve no good purpose for us to do more than to.say that, upon the facts found, it was the duty of his Honor to direct a mistrial and hold the prisoner. The jury provided by law for the trial of indictments is composed of twelve men ; *807 a less number is not a jury, and a trial by jury in a criminal action cannot be waived by the accused. State v. Stewart, 89 N. C., 563. While it might have been permissible to call another juror in place of the one who was sick, and begin the trial anew, it was a matter in the control of the presiding Judge, who we doubt not for good reasons pursued the regular course. Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 S.E. 720, 115 N.C. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scruggs-nc-1894.