State v. . Scruggs

20 S.E. 720, 115 N.C. 805
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 20 S.E. 720 (State v. . Scruggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Scruggs, 20 S.E. 720, 115 N.C. 805 (N.C. 1894).

Opinion

MacRae, J.:

No appeal lies in a criminal action until after the rendition of final judgment in the cause. State v. Twiggs, 90 N. C., 685. If the case were properly before us, as on an application for a certiorari, we should find no ground for granting the writ, for it has long been settled that, in a trial for a capital felony, for sufficient cause the Judge may discharge the jury and hold the prisoner for another trial. In which case it is his duty to find the facts and set them out in the record, so that his conclusion as to the matter of law arising from the facts may be reviewed by this Court. State v. Jefferson, 74 N. C., 309. All this his Honor did, and it will serve no good purpose for us to do more than to.say that, upon the facts found, it was the duty of his Honor to direct a mistrial and hold the prisoner. The jury provided by law for the trial of indictments is composed of twelve men ; *807 a less number is not a jury, and a trial by jury in a criminal action cannot be waived by the accused. State v. Stewart, 89 N. C., 563. While it might have been permissible to call another juror in place of the one who was sick, and begin the trial anew, it was a matter in the control of the presiding Judge, who we doubt not for good reasons pursued the regular course. Appeal Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hudson
185 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)
State v. Crocker
80 S.E.2d 243 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. Emery
224 N.C. 581 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)
State v. . Dalton
174 S.E. 422 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Beal
154 S.E. 604 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
State v. . Rouse
139 S.E. 433 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Commonwealth v. Hall
7 Pa. D. & C. 689 (Philadelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1926)
State v. . Wheeler
116 S.E. 413 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
State v. . Ford
83 S.E. 831 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
S. v. . Rogers
78 S.E. 293 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
State v. Rogers
162 N.C. 656 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Dennis v. State
50 So. 499 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1909)
Hall v. Hall.
42 S.E. 562 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1902)
West v. State
42 Fla. 244 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E. 720, 115 N.C. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scruggs-nc-1894.