State v. Scruggs

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Scruggs

392 S.W.3d 531, 2013 WL 704411, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 243

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 2013·No. No. ED 98117·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Scruggs (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, convicting him of statutory rape in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joshua Scruggs (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, convicting him of statutory rape in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Scruggs, 392 S.W.3d 531, 2013 WL 704411, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 243 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

392 S.W.3d 531 (State v. Scruggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.