State v. Scripture

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Scripture

705 P.2d 1162, 75 Or. App. 320, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3857

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 18, 1985

Docket84-87-CR; CA A32955

StatusPublished

This text of 705 P.2d 1162 (State v. Scripture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Scripture, 705 P.2d 1162, 75 Or. App. 320, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3857 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for attempted rape of a three-year-old child. The sole claim of error is that the court admitted the testimony of a CSD caseworker reciting what the victim had told her. The issues raised are identical to those raised in State v. Campbell, 299 Or 633, 705 P2d 694 (1985). We reverse and remand for further proceedings as required by Campbell.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for attempted rape of a three-year-old child. The sole claim of error is that the court admitted the testimony of a CSD caseworker reciting what the victim had told her. The issues raised are identical to those raised in State v. Campbell, 299 Or 633, 705 P2d 694 (1985). We reverse and remand for further proceedings as required by Campbell.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 P.2d 1162, 75 Or. App. 320, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scripture-orctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack