State v. Scott

747 N.E.2d 242, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1268
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 30, 2001·No. No. 01-807·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby allows the appeal.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution scheduled for May 15, 2001, pending consideration of Scott’s competency to be executed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion-for stay be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County shall transmit the record by May 4, 2001.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties file their merit briefs no later than May 8, 2001. No responsive briefs shall be filed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents in part because he would grant the motion for stay. Douglas, J., dissents. Cook, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Scott, 747 N.E.2d 242, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1268 (Ohio 2001).

747 N.E.2d 242 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheppard v. Bagley
604 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (S.D. Ohio, 2009)
State v. Lott
2002 Ohio 6625 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
State v. Scott
2001 Ohio 148 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)