State v. Scott
937 A.2d 949, 193 N.J. 227, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 1
Opinions
This matter came to the Court on defendant’s appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 2:2-l(a)(2). The sole issue before the Court— whether defendant actually or constructively possessed cocaine that was found in the vehicle in which he was a passenger — arose from the dissent filed by Judge Fuentes. In respect of that issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 398 N.J.Super. 142, 940 A.2d 299, 2006 WL 2690000 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Scott, 937 A.2d 949, 193 N.J. 227, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 1 (N.J. 2008).
937 A.2d 949 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of New Jersey v. Norman Pinkney
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
State of New Jersey v. Shannon A. McGuigan
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2024
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. LANCE S. RICHARDSON (13-03-0272, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BROOKS G. HARRIS (09-07-0422, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2019