State v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Scott

99 A. 342, 89 N.J.L. 726, 4 Gummere 726, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 391

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 N.J.L. 133 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 4, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Por the reasons contained in the opinion filed this term by Mr. Justice Minturn in the case of State v. George M. Brewster., ante p. 658, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be reversed and the judgment of conviction of the defendant in the Mercer Sessions will be affirmed.

For affirmance—Hone.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Teen chard, Parker, Mtnturn, Black, White, Heppenheoiior, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Por the reasons contained in the opinion filed this term by Mr. Justice Minturn in the case of State v. George M. Brewster., ante p. 658, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be reversed and the judgment of conviction of the defendant in the Mercer Sessions will be affirmed.

For affirmance—Hone.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Teen chard, Parker, Mtnturn, Black, White, Heppenheoiior, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

State v. Scott, 99 A. 342, 89 N.J.L. 726, 4 Gummere 726, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 391 (N.J. 1916).

Pincite

99 A. 342 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.