State v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Scott

99 A. 342, 89 N.J.L. 726, 4 Gummere 726, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 391

DecidedDecember 4, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A. 342 (State v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Scott, 99 A. 342, 89 N.J.L. 726, 4 Gummere 726, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 391 (N.J. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Por the reasons contained in the opinion filed this term by Mr. Justice Minturn in the case of State v. George M. Brewster., ante p. 658, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be reversed and the judgment of conviction of the defendant in the Mercer Sessions will be affirmed.

For affirmance—Hone.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Teen chard, Parker, Mtnturn, Black, White, Heppenheoiior, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Por the reasons contained in the opinion filed this term by Mr. Justice Minturn in the case of State v. George M. Brewster., ante p. 658, the judgment of the Supreme Court will be reversed and the judgment of conviction of the defendant in the Mercer Sessions will be affirmed.

For affirmance—Hone.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Teen chard, Parker, Mtnturn, Black, White, Heppenheoiior, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A. 342, 89 N.J.L. 726, 4 Gummere 726, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scott-nj-1916.