State v. Scott
386 S.W.3d 928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645, 2012 WL 6682202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140 →
Opinion
ORDER
Jerome Scott appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of one count of forgery after a jury trial. Scott claims that the trial court erred in entering its judgment because the State’s evidence failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Scott acted with the purpose to defraud Jack Martin when he signed the credit card receipt after using Martin’s credit card. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Scott, 386 S.W.3d 928, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645, 2012 WL 6682202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
386 S.W.3d 928 (State v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.