State v. Scott Christopher Turner

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 30, 2004
Docket13-04-00338-CR
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Scott Christopher Turner (State v. Scott Christopher Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Scott Christopher Turner, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-338-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                     Appellant,


v.


SCOTT CHRISTOPHER TURNER,                                          Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 24th District Court

of Jackson County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, THE STATE OF TEXAS, attempted to perfect an appeal from a shock probation order entered by the 24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas, in cause no. 97-9-5950. The clerk’s record was received on August 12, 2004.

         Upon review of the clerk’s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not an appealable order. Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to file a response as requested by this Court’s notice.

         The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 30th day of December, 2004.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Scott Christopher Turner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scott-christopher-turner-texapp-2004.