State v. Schwartzbach

513 So. 2d 756, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12250
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 1987
DocketNo. 87-0255
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 513 So. 2d 756 (State v. Schwartzbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schwartzbach, 513 So. 2d 756, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the record in this case supports the trial court’s findings of fact and ultimate conclusion. However, we do not adopt the specific language of the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress. We do not believe a person’s consent to a search is per se involuntary whenever law enforcement officers board a commercial carrier such as a bus or other similar forms of transportation.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Avery
531 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
513 So. 2d 756, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schwartzbach-fladistctapp-1987.