State v. Schwartzbach

513 So. 2d 756, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12250
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 1987·No. No. 87-0255·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the record in this case supports the trial court’s findings of fact and ultimate conclusion. However, we do not adopt the specific language of the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress. We do not believe a person’s consent to a search is per se involuntary whenever law enforcement officers board a commercial carrier such as a bus or other similar forms of transportation.

LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schwartzbach, 513 So. 2d 756, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2380, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12250 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

513 So. 2d 756 (State v. Schwartzbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Avery
531 So. 2d 182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)