State v. Schwartz

157 P.3d 312, 212 Or. App. 212, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 533
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 18, 2007·No. 0303226CR; A126815·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal trespass while in possession of a firearm. ORS 164.265. Among other things, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. The state concedes that, even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, the record contains insufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schwartz, 157 P.3d 312, 212 Or. App. 212, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 533 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

157 P.3d 312 (State v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 164.265
Oregon § 164.265