State v. Schwartz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Schwartz

157 P.3d 312, 212 Or. App. 212, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 533

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 18, 2007

Docket0303226CR; A126815

StatusPublished

This text of 157 P.3d 312 (State v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schwartz, 157 P.3d 312, 212 Or. App. 212, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 533 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal trespass while in possession of a firearm. ORS 164.265. Among other things, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. The state concedes that, even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, the record contains insufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal trespass while in possession of a firearm. ORS 164.265. Among other things, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal. The state concedes that, even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, the record contains insufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found each element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 P.3d 312, 212 Or. App. 212, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schwartz-orctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack