State v. Schuster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Schuster

829 P.2d 93, 112 Or. App. 317, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 688

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 8, 1992

Docket9109-97022; CA A71597

StatusPublished

This text of 829 P.2d 93 (State v. Schuster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schuster, 829 P.2d 93, 112 Or. App. 317, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 688 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, the state concedes that the trial court erred in finding appellant to be a mentally ill person within the meaning of ORS 426.005(2). Nonetheless, we are required to conduct a de novo review.

On the basis of that review, we agree with the state: “This is one of those cases where the relationship between [the] appellant’s medical condition and her emotional lability[¹] cannot be gleaned from [the] record.”

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this mental commitment case, the state concedes that the trial court erred in finding appellant to be a mentally ill person within the meaning of ORS 426.005(2). Nonetheless, we are required to conduct a de novo review.

On the basis of that review, we agree with the state: “This is one of those cases where the relationship between [the] appellant’s medical condition and her emotional lability[¹] cannot be gleaned from [the] record.”

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

829 P.2d 93, 112 Or. App. 317, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schuster-orctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack