Home/New Mexico Supreme Court/State v. Schultz

State v. Schultz

279 P. 561, 34 N.M. 214
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 24, 1929
DocketNo. 3359.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 279 P. 561 (State v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schultz, 279 P. 561, 34 N.M. 214 (N.M. 1929).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Appellant was. convicted of embezzlement.

We find ho merit in the contention based upon the refusal of requested instructions. Their subject-matter was sufficiently included in instructions given.

On cross-examination the court permitted appellant to be asked whether he had not taken mortgaged property out of the state. The ruling was no doubt made on the authority of State v. Bailey, 27 N. M. 145, 198 P. 529, which seems to justify it.

The judgment must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

BICKLEY, C. J., and PARKER, J, concur. CATRON and SIMMS, JJ., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hargrove
464 P.2d 564 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1970)
State v. Holden
113 P.2d 171 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1941)
State v. Solis
37 P.2d 539 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 P. 561, 34 N.M. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schultz-nm-1929.