State v. Schroeder

17 A.2d 777, 126 N.J.L. 59, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 290
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 28, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.2d 777 (State v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schroeder, 17 A.2d 777, 126 N.J.L. 59, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.

As regards an asserted error in the charge to the jury, the opinion notes that “No exception to the court’s charge in this particular was taken * * Pearing misinterpretation, we deem it prudent to point out that, under the statute, *60 a specific exception was not necessary to sustain either an assignment of error or a cause for reversal. R. S. 1937, 2:196-14, 2:195-16, 2:195-20.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rabeerty Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.2d 777, 126 N.J.L. 59, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schroeder-nj-1941.