State v. Schroeder
This text of 17 A.2d 777 (State v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.
As regards an asserted error in the charge to the jury, the opinion notes that “No exception to the court’s charge in this particular was taken * * Pearing misinterpretation, we deem it prudent to point out that, under the statute, *60 a specific exception was not necessary to sustain either an assignment of error or a cause for reversal. R. S. 1937, 2:196-14, 2:195-16, 2:195-20.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rabeerty Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 A.2d 777, 126 N.J.L. 59, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schroeder-nj-1941.