State v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Schroeder

17 A.2d 777, 126 N.J.L. 59, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 290

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 28, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.

As regards an asserted error in the charge to the jury, the opinion notes that “No exception to the court’s charge in this particular was taken * * Pearing misinterpretation, we deem it prudent to point out that, under the statute, *60 a specific exception was not necessary to sustain either an assignment of error or a cause for reversal. R. S. 1937, 2:196-14, 2:195-16, 2:195-20.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rabeerty Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.

As regards an asserted error in the charge to the jury, the opinion notes that “No exception to the court’s charge in this particular was taken * * Pearing misinterpretation, we deem it prudent to point out that, under the statute, *60 a specific exception was not necessary to sustain either an assignment of error or a cause for reversal. R. S. 1937, 2:196-14, 2:195-16, 2:195-20.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rabeerty Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

State v. Schroeder, 17 A.2d 777, 126 N.J.L. 59, 1941 N.J. LEXIS 290 (N.J. 1941).

Pincite

17 A.2d 777 (State v. Schroeder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.