State v. Schroeder

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Schroeder

493 S.W.3d 54, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 2016 WL 3947389

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 19, 2016

DocketWD 77480

StatusPublished

This text of 493 S.W.3d 54 (State v. Schroeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schroeder, 493 S.W.3d 54, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 2016 WL 3947389 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, Stephen Schroeder was found guilty of first-degree statutory sodomy in the Circuit Court of Johnson County. The charge was based on an incident in which Schroeder forced a seven-year-old girl to touch his penis with her hand. The court sentenced him to a term of ten years’ imprisonment. Schroeder appeals, arguing that the circuit court erred in limiting the testimony of his expert witness regarding the techniques used by the State to interview the victim. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial, Stephen Schroeder was found guilty of first-degree statutory sodomy in the Circuit Court of Johnson County. The charge was based on an incident in which Schroeder forced a seven-year-old girl to touch his penis with her hand. The court sentenced him to a term of ten years’ imprisonment. Schroeder appeals, arguing that the circuit court erred in limiting the testimony of his expert witness regarding the techniques used by the State to interview the victim. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

493 S.W.3d 54, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 707, 2016 WL 3947389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schroeder-moctapp-2016.