State v. Schreibeis, Ca2007-01-001 (6-18-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

State v. Schreibeis, Ca2007-01-001 (6-18-2007)

2007 Ohio 3004

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 18, 2007

DocketNo. CA2007-01-001.

StatusPublished

This text of 2007 Ohio 3004 (State v. Schreibeis, Ca2007-01-001 (6-18-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schreibeis, Ca2007-01-001 (6-18-2007), 2007 Ohio 3004 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Frank Schreibeis, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) *Page 2 indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

YOUNG, P.J., BRESSLER and POWELL, JJ., concur.

*Page 3

JUDGMENT ENTRY The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Frank Schreibeis, filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738,87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) *Page 2 indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists five potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

YOUNG, P.J., BRESSLER and POWELL, JJ., concur.

*Page 3

JUDGMENT ENTRY The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this judgment entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed in compliance with App.R. 24.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2007 Ohio 3004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schreibeis-ca2007-01-001-6-18-2007-ohioctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack