State v. Schrecengost

511 P.3d 89, 319 Or. App. 846
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 25, 2022
DocketA174617
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 P.3d 89 (State v. Schrecengost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schrecengost, 511 P.3d 89, 319 Or. App. 846 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Submitted May 4, affirmed May 25, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERIC MILES SCHRECENGOST, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 19CR48443; A174617 511 P3d 89

Susan M. Tripp, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and David O. Ferry, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Stacy M. Chaffin, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Pagán, Judge, and Armstrong, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Parker, 259 Or App 547, 549, 314 P3d 980 (2013), rev den, 355 Or 380 (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sandoval v. Business Oregon
511 P.3d 89 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 P.3d 89, 319 Or. App. 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schrecengost-orctapp-2022.