State v. SCHOOLING

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. SCHOOLING

241 S.W.3d 837, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2007 WL 4482173

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2007·No. WD 68080·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Schooling appeals his conviction for stealing in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 2000. Schooling claims that certain comments made by the court during voir dire should have resulted in a mistrial or dismissal of the entire jury panel.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Schooling appeals his conviction for stealing in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 2000. Schooling claims that certain comments made by the court during voir dire should have resulted in a mistrial or dismissal of the entire jury panel.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. SCHOOLING, 241 S.W.3d 837, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2007 WL 4482173 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

241 S.W.3d 837 (State v. SCHOOLING) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.