State v. SCHOOLING

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. SCHOOLING

241 S.W.3d 837, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2007 WL 4482173

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 26, 2007

DocketWD 68080

StatusPublished

This text of 241 S.W.3d 837 (State v. SCHOOLING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. SCHOOLING, 241 S.W.3d 837, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2007 WL 4482173 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Schooling appeals his conviction for stealing in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 2000. Schooling claims that certain comments made by the court during voir dire should have resulted in a mistrial or dismissal of the entire jury panel.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Schooling appeals his conviction for stealing in violation of section 570.030, RSMo 2000. Schooling claims that certain comments made by the court during voir dire should have resulted in a mistrial or dismissal of the entire jury panel.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 S.W.3d 837, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1757, 2007 WL 4482173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schooling-moctapp-2007.