State v. Schoolfield

326 S.W.3d 833, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2010 WL 5070634
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 14, 2010
DocketWD 71107
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 326 S.W.3d 833 (State v. Schoolfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schoolfield, 326 S.W.3d 833, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2010 WL 5070634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lyle M. Schoolfield was convicted in the Circuit Court of Ray County of one count of sale of a controlled substance, two counts of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia with the intent to deliver or sell. On appeal, Schoolfield challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on each count. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SCHERDER v. Sonntag
326 S.W.3d 833 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 S.W.3d 833, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2010 WL 5070634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schoolfield-moctapp-2010.