State v. Schoolfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Schoolfield

326 S.W.3d 833, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2010 WL 5070634

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 2010·No. WD 71107·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lyle M. Schoolfield was convicted in the Circuit Court of Ray County of one count of sale of a controlled substance, two counts of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia with the intent to deliver or sell. On appeal, Schoolfield challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on each count. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lyle M. Schoolfield was convicted in the Circuit Court of Ray County of one count of sale of a controlled substance, two counts of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia with the intent to deliver or sell. On appeal, Schoolfield challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on each count. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Schoolfield, 326 S.W.3d 833, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723, 2010 WL 5070634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

326 S.W.3d 833 (State v. Schoolfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related