State v. Schoolcraft

Supreme Court of Vermont

State v. Schoolcraft

47 A. 786, 72 Vt. 223, 1900 Vt. LEXIS 118

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedMarch 9, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 47 A. 786 (State v. Schoolcraft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schoolcraft, 47 A. 786, 72 Vt. 223, 1900 Vt. LEXIS 118 (Vt. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Munson, J.

In the court below the respondent-claimed that the indictment was defective for the reason that “it did not particularly in terms refer to sections 2703 and 2701 of the Vermont Statutes,” and for the further reason that it did not set forth that the deci-ee of divorce remained in effect at the time of the cohabiting. These points are not now urged. The points which are urged were not made in the court below, and therefore cannot be considered.

Judgment that there is no error in the proceedings and that the respondent take nothing hy his exceptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Munson, J.

In the court below the respondent-claimed that the indictment was defective for the reason that “it did not particularly in terms refer to sections 2703 and 2701 of the Vermont Statutes,” and for the further reason that it did not set forth that the deci-ee of divorce remained in effect at the time of the cohabiting. These points are not now urged. The points which are urged were not made in the court below, and therefore cannot be considered.

Judgment that there is no error in the proceedings and that the respondent take nothing hy his exceptions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A. 786, 72 Vt. 223, 1900 Vt. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schoolcraft-vt-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack