State v. Schoolcraft

47 A. 786, 72 Vt. 223, 1900 Vt. LEXIS 118
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided March 9, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Munson, J.

In the court below the respondent-claimed that the indictment was defective for the reason that “it did not particularly in terms refer to sections 2703 and 2701 of the Vermont Statutes,” and for the further reason that it did not set forth that the deci-ee of divorce remained in effect at the time of the cohabiting. These points are not now urged. The points which are urged were not made in the court below, and therefore cannot be considered.

Judgment that there is no error in the proceedings and that the respondent take nothing hy his exceptions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schoolcraft, 47 A. 786, 72 Vt. 223, 1900 Vt. LEXIS 118 (Vt. 1900).

47 A. 786 (State v. Schoolcraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Monte
99 A. 264 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1916)
Van Dyke v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
78 A. 958 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1911)
Cushman & Rankin Co. v. Boston & Maine Railroad
73 A. 1073 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1909)
State v. Sargood
68 A. 49 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1907)