State v. Schonhausen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Schonhausen

37 La. Ann. 42

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 15, 1885

DocketNo. 9286

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 La. Ann. 42 (State v. Schonhausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Schonhausen, 37 La. Ann. 42 (La. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Manning, J.

This ai>peal is from a judgment condemning the defendant Schonhausen to pay a license of one thousand dollars for keeping a fixed place for concert, dancing, and variety performances in this city.

[43]*43The defence is the same as that urged in State v. O’Hara, 36 Ann 93 and is untenable for the reasons given in that case.

The judgment was rendered in June 1884 and a suspensive appeal was taken. The State prays for ten per centum upon the license as damages for a frivolous appeal. We shall inflict it.

The decision in the O’Hara case had been rendered several months when the judgment in this case was pronounced and the appeal taken, and the same O’Hara is a co-defendant with Schonhausen here, although the latter avows himself sole proprietor.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, and that iu addition thereto the State do now have and recover of the defendant Schonhausen ten per centum upon the judgment below as damages for a frivolous appeal and the costs of both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Manning, J.

This ai>peal is from a judgment condemning the defendant Schonhausen to pay a license of one thousand dollars for keeping a fixed place for concert, dancing, and variety performances in this city.

[43]*43The defence is the same as that urged in State v. O’Hara, 36 Ann 93 and is untenable for the reasons given in that case.

The judgment was rendered in June 1884 and a suspensive appeal was taken. The State prays for ten per centum upon the license as damages for a frivolous appeal. We shall inflict it.

The decision in the O’Hara case had been rendered several months when the judgment in this case was pronounced and the appeal taken, and the same O’Hara is a co-defendant with Schonhausen here, although the latter avows himself sole proprietor.

It is therefore ordered and decreed that the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, and that iu addition thereto the State do now have and recover of the defendant Schonhausen ten per centum upon the judgment below as damages for a frivolous appeal and the costs of both courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 La. Ann. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schonhausen-la-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack