Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Schneider

State v. Schneider

71 P.3d 166, 188 Or. App. 314, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 721
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 12, 2003
Docket01CR0006; A115098
StatusPublished

This text of 71 P.3d 166 (State v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schneider, 71 P.3d 166, 188 Or. App. 314, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 721 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and distribution of a controlled substance, arguing that the police officer did not have reasonable grounds to request defendant’s consent to a search of his home under the conditions of defendant’s parole on another offense. See State v. Gulley, 324 Or 57, 921 P2d 396 (1996); State v. Guzman, 164 Or App 90, 990 P2d 370 (1999), rev den, 331 Or 91 (2000). The state concedes error, and we agree.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Harberts
11 P.3d 641 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2000)
State v. Gulley
921 P.2d 396 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1996)
State v. Guzman
990 P.2d 370 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 P.3d 166, 188 Or. App. 314, 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schneider-orctapp-2003.