State v. Schlee

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Schlee

858 N.E.2d 428, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1401

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Schlee. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 3d 153 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 2006·No. 2006-1608·Published

Opinion

Lake App. No. 2005-L-105, 2005-Ohio-3208. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Lake County. It appearing to the court that appellant is without counsel,

It is ordered by the court that Douglas R. Cole and F. Eugene Crawford of Columbus, Ohio are appointed to represent appellant on a pro bono basis.

It is further ordered that appellant shall file a merit brief within forty days of the date of this entry, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(3) and S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 2005-L-105, 2005-Ohio-3208. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Lake County. It appearing to the court that appellant is without counsel,

It is ordered by the court that Douglas R. Cole and F. Eugene Crawford of Columbus, Ohio are appointed to represent appellant on a pro bono basis.

It is further ordered that appellant shall file a merit brief within forty days of the date of this entry, and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(3) and S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

State v. Schlee, 858 N.E.2d 428, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

858 N.E.2d 428 (State v. Schlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related