State v. Schiappa

695 A.2d 541, 241 Conn. 908
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 29, 1997·No. SC 15696·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 731 (AC 14450), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the requirement of the unavailability of the declarant was not met with respect to witness Stephen Staffy’s statement?

“2. With respect to the statement of witness Gary Meier: (a) did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s claim was of constitutional magnitude under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), and (b) if the answer to (a) is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instructions regarding adoptive admissions by a defendant were improper?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Schiappa, 695 A.2d 541, 241 Conn. 908 (Colo. 1997).

695 A.2d 541 (State v. Schiappa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Schiappa
728 A.2d 466 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
State v. Rogers
718 A.2d 985 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)