State v. Scheetz
185 A. 20, 14 N.J. Misc. 397, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 343
Opinion
Except for the changes in the identity of the parties litigant and of their attorneys this case is in all things the same as State, Harriet V. Colton, Relator, &c., v. Edith Kreutzinger, 116 N. J. L. 456; 185 Atl. Rep. 18, decided contemporaneously herewith. Por the reasons stated in the determination of that ease the demurrer herein is overruled and judgment on the information will be for the respondent, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Scheetz, 185 A. 20, 14 N.J. Misc. 397, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 343 (N.J. 1936).
185 A. 20 (State v. Scheetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elizabethtown Borough v. Savastio Construction, Inc.
44 Pa. D. & C.2d 596 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1968)
Barati v. M.S.I. Corp.
37 Pa. D. & C.2d 395 (Washington County Court of Common Pleas, 1965)