State v. Schauf
This text of 863 P.2d 1315 (State v. Schauf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. The trial court ordered him to pay court-appointed attorney fees of $400. He assigns error to the amount of attorney fees imposed on the ground that defense counsel was only paid $280 for the case. The state concedes that the cost of defendant’s representation was only $280 and that it can only recover the amount actually expended. We accept the state’s concession and remand to the trial court to correct the judgment.
Defendant’s other assignment of error is without merit.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for entry of a corrected judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
863 P.2d 1315, 125 Or. App. 274, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schauf-orctapp-1993.