State v. Scharlepp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Scharlepp

255 So. 3d 995

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2018

DocketNo. 1D18-1511

StatusPublished

This text of 255 So. 3d 995 (State v. Scharlepp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Scharlepp, 255 So. 3d 995 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The state seeks a writ of prohibition disqualifying the trial judge in a pending criminal matter. We agree that in denying the state's second motion to disqualify, the trial judge attempted to refute the charges of partiality. This created an independent basis for disqualification. See Bundy v. Rudd , 366 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla. 1978) ("When a judge has looked beyond the mere legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and has attempted to refute the charges of partiality, he has then exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone established grounds for his disqualification."); accord Lee Mem'l Health Sys. v. State, Agency for Health Care Admin. , 910 So.2d 892, 893 (Fla 1st DCA 2005) ; Martin v. State , 820 So.2d 403, 404 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2002).

We grant the petition but withhold formal issuance of the writ as we are confident the judge will promptly issue an order of disqualification.

Ray, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The state seeks a writ of prohibition disqualifying the trial judge in a pending criminal matter. We agree that in denying the state's second motion to disqualify, the trial judge attempted to refute the charges of partiality. This created an independent basis for disqualification. See Bundy v. Rudd , 366 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla. 1978) ("When a judge has looked beyond the mere legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and has attempted to refute the charges of partiality, he has then exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone established grounds for his disqualification."); accord Lee Mem'l Health Sys. v. State, Agency for Health Care Admin. , 910 So.2d 892, 893 (Fla 1st DCA 2005) ; Martin v. State , 820 So.2d 403, 404 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2002).

We grant the petition but withhold formal issuance of the writ as we are confident the judge will promptly issue an order of disqualification.

Ray, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 So. 3d 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scharlepp-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack