Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Schank

State v. Schank

625 So. 2d 999, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11182, 1993 WL 437776
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 1, 1993
DocketNo. 92-02419
StatusPublished

This text of 625 So. 2d 999 (State v. Schank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Schank, 625 So. 2d 999, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11182, 1993 WL 437776 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal by the State from a downward departure sentence. The trial court’s failure to issue contemporaneous written reasons for downward departure requires resentencing with no possibility of departure from the guidelines. State v. Howell, 611 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); see Fraser v. State, 602 So.2d 1299 (Fla.1992); Owens v. State, 598 So.2d 64 (Fla.1992); and Pope v. State, 561 So.2d.554 (Fla.1990). Ap-[1000]*1000pellee’s sentence is vacated, and this cause is remanded for resentencing.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fraser v. State
602 So. 2d 1299 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Owens v. State
598 So. 2d 64 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
State v. Howell
611 So. 2d 5 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 999, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11182, 1993 WL 437776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-schank-fladistctapp-1993.