State v. Schamburge
349 So. 2d 247, 1977 La. LEXIS 5716
Opinion
The question of timeliness of the application for rehearing is an issue; nevertheless, the resolution of that issue would be fruitless because the application is not meritorious. The issue in State v. Anderson, La., 349 So.2d 811, rehearing denied this day, is not before the court in this case.
SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the application is untimely and should not be considered. Questions arising out of the timeliness issue are properly the subject of post conviction remedy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Schamburge, 349 So. 2d 247, 1977 La. LEXIS 5716 (La. 1977).
349 So. 2d 247 (State v. Schamburge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Subdivision Planning Engineers, Inc. v. Manor Development Corp.
349 So. 2d 247 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1977)