State v. Scarlet

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Scarlet

505 S.W.3d 449, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2016 WL 7321746

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 2016·No. ED 103596·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert M. Scarlet appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction after a jury trial of first-degree involuntary manslaughter, second-degree assault, and careless and imprudent driving. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2016).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert M. Scarlet appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction after a jury trial of first-degree involuntary manslaughter, second-degree assault, and careless and imprudent driving. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2016).

State v. Scarlet, 505 S.W.3d 449, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1268, 2016 WL 7321746 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 449 (State v. Scarlet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.