State v. Scarboro
This text of State v. Scarboro (State v. Scarboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 120301025 Argued: October 2, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF MARYLAND
No. 4
September Term, 2024
STATE OF MARYLAND
v.
DOMINICK SCARBORO
Fader, C.J., Watts Booth Biran Gould Eaves Killough JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: October 4, 2024
Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
09:35:57 2024.10.04 '00'04-
Gregory Hilton, Clerk * IN THE * STATE OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * Pet. No. 333, September Term, 2023 DOMINICK SCARBORO * No. 4, September Term, 2024 *
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument, it is this 4th day of
October 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland,
ORDERED that the writ of certiorari is dismissed with costs as improvidently
granted and No. 4, September Term, 2024 is closed in this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that costs are to be paid by Petitioner.
/s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Scarboro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scarboro-md-2024.