State v. Scallon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Scallon

369 So. 2d 152, 1979 La. LEXIS 5663

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 23, 1979

DocketNo. 64077

StatusPublished

This text of 369 So. 2d 152 (State v. Scallon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Scallon, 369 So. 2d 152, 1979 La. LEXIS 5663 (La. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Morris Seallon, applying for writ of certiorari (review), prohibition, or mandamus. Rapides Parish City Court. No. J 4719.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable George M. Foote, Judge of the City Court of Alexandria, for the Parish of Rapides, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 6th day of April, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Morris Seallon, applying for writ of certiorari (review), prohibition, or mandamus. Rapides Parish City Court. No. J 4719.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable George M. Foote, Judge of the City Court of Alexandria, for the Parish of Rapides, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 6th day of April, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 So. 2d 152, 1979 La. LEXIS 5663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-scallon-la-1979.