State v. Savanah

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Savanah

414 P.3d 572, 190 Wash. 2d 1008

Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 2018·No. No. 95292-2·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to amend the petition for review is also denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to amend the petition for review is also denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Savanah, 414 P.3d 572, 190 Wash. 2d 1008 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

414 P.3d 572 (State v. Savanah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.