State v. Saunders

361 A.2d 111, 142 N.J. Super. 287
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided June 21, 1976·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

142 N.J. Super. 287 (1976)
361 A.2d 111

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES SAUNDERS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 14, 1976.
Decided June 21, 1976.

Before Judges KOLE, ARD and COLLESTER.

*288 Mr. Alan Silber argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Robert A. Baime, of counsel).

Mr. Roy B. Greenman, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor of Essex County, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The conviction of defendant is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Bedford. Cf. Doe v. Commonwealth's Attorney for City of Richmond, D.C., 403 F. Supp. 1199, aff'd ___ U.S. ___, 96 S.Ct. 1489, 47 L.Ed.2d 751 (1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Saunders, 361 A.2d 111, 142 N.J. Super. 287 (N.J. Ct. App. 1976).

361 A.2d 111 (State v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Saunders
381 A.2d 333 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1977)
State v. Tropea
361 A.2d 111 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)