State v. Saunders

344 So. 2d 567, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3886
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 31, 1977·No. No. 47437·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ROBERTS (Retired), JJ., concur. ENGLAND, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Saunders, 344 So. 2d 567, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3886 (Fla. 1977).

344 So. 2d 567 (State v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ippolito v. State
678 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
In the Interest of S.T. v. State
629 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
ST v. State
629 So. 2d 316 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Murrell v. State
595 So. 2d 1049 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hayes v. State
592 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
In Re Weinstein
518 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Menut v. State
446 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)