State v. Satterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Satterfield

895 N.E.2d 565, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1502

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 29, 2008·No. 2008-1424·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hamilton App. Nos. C-070414 and C-070415. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2007-0693, State v. Bloomer, Fulton App. No. F-06-012, 2007-0hio-1039, 2007-1415, State v. Mosmeyer, Hamilton App. No. C-060747, and 2007-1439, State v. Barnes, Portage App. No. 2006-P-0089, 2007-Ohio-3362; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. Nos. C-070414 and C-070415. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2007-0693, State v. Bloomer, Fulton App. No. F-06-012, 2007-0hio-1039, 2007-1415, State v. Mosmeyer, Hamilton App. No. C-060747, and 2007-1439, State v. Barnes, Portage App. No. 2006-P-0089, 2007-Ohio-3362; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

State v. Satterfield, 895 N.E.2d 565, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1502 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

895 N.E.2d 565 (State v. Satterfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related