State v. Satterfield
This text of 138 N.W.2d 656 (State v. Satterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The information in this case charges that defendant neglected and refused to testify and to permit examination of his records pertaining to his 1963 personal tax return for intangible property, in violation of section 77-718, R. R. S. 1943 (prior to the 1965 amendment). On demurrer the district court dismissed the information in February 1965, and the State filed notice of appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for the reason that no application for leave to docket error proceedings has been presented. “The county attorney shall * * * present such application to the Supreme Court within one month from the date of the final order, * * § 29-2315.01, R. R. S. 1943. See, also, State v. Halphrey, 14 Neb. 578, 16 N. W. 823.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
138 N.W.2d 656, 179 Neb. 451, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-satterfield-neb-1965.