State v. Sargent

553 A.2d 219, 1989 Me. LEXIS 13
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided January 27, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The defendant, Richard Sargent, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County; Beaulieu, J.), declaring a forfeiture of his $7500 cash bail. We find no clear error in the court’s finding that Sargent breached a condition of his bond by failing to appear for execution of his sentence after his conviction for armed robbery was affirmed.1 15 M.R.S.A. § 1094 (Supp.1988); M.R.Crim.P. 46D(a)(l). Furthermore, we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s failure to set aside the forfeiture and remit some or all of the amount forfeited. State v. Ellis, 272 A.2d 357, 360 (Me.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 859, 92 S.Ct. 107, 30 L.Ed.2d 101 (1971); M.R.Crim.P. 46D(a)(2) and (4).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sargent, 553 A.2d 219, 1989 Me. LEXIS 13 (Me. 1989).

553 A.2d 219 (State v. Sargent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deering v. State of Maine
Maine Superior, 2000