State v. Sargent
This text of 553 A.2d 219 (State v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
The defendant, Richard Sargent, appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Penobscot County; Beaulieu, J.), declaring a forfeiture of his $7500 cash bail. We find no clear error in the court’s finding that Sargent breached a condition of his bond by failing to appear for execution of his sentence after his conviction for armed robbery was affirmed.1 15 M.R.S.A. § 1094 (Supp.1988); M.R.Crim.P. 46D(a)(l). Furthermore, we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s failure to set aside the forfeiture and remit some or all of the amount forfeited. State v. Ellis, 272 A.2d 357, 360 (Me.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 859, 92 S.Ct. 107, 30 L.Ed.2d 101 (1971); M.R.Crim.P. 46D(a)(2) and (4).
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
553 A.2d 219, 1989 Me. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sargent-me-1989.