State v. Sargent

489 A.2d 1106, 1985 Me. LEXIS 899
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMarch 29, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 489 A.2d 1106 (State v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sargent, 489 A.2d 1106, 1985 Me. LEXIS 899 (Me. 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Ralph E. Sargent appeals from a Superior Court, Oxford County, jury conviction for gross sexual misconduct, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (1983). Our review of the record reveals no fatal variance between the indictment and proof. See State v. Carmichael, 444 A.2d 45, 47-48 (Me.1982). We also reject defendant’s contention that the victim’s testimony is incredible and therefore insufficient to support the conviction. See State v. Brown, 479 A.2d 1317, 1318 (Me.1984).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Carmichael
444 A.2d 45 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1982)
State v. Brown
479 A.2d 1317 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 A.2d 1106, 1985 Me. LEXIS 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sargent-me-1985.